This looks for evidence of doping but not necessarily the substances used themselves. For example, it detects increased ability to carry oxygen in the blood that is likely caused by use of EPO or similar drugs.
The athlete biological passport has had successes and some cyclists and athletes have been suspended through its use. But it has struggled to catch those using microdosing - taking small regular doses of drugs like EPO rather than single large doses. The knowledge required to avoid testing positive is certainly not beyond medics working with athletes. If they know the time the drug remains in the body they can calculate how long before a competition use must be stopped.
The best way of not testing positive in this period is not to be tested. Athletes give their whereabouts for one hour of each day in advance. Athletes have been known to give incorrect addresses to avoid testers or to simply hide if they know they are at risk.
There is a rule that three missed tests over 18 months constitutes a doping offence. That gives you one or two chances to avoid testing and blame logistics or disorganisation, a risk some athletes are willing to take. It was this rule that led to Olympic and World m champion Christine Ohuruogu serving a one-year suspension , though she has always vehemently denied any wrongdoing. The performance benefits vary between substances, but a common method of doping is the use of erythropoietin EPO , a hormone naturally produced by the human body, but which can also be stored and injected artificially.
EPO stimulates red blood cell production, which in turn helps endurance competitors to keep going for longer: red blood cells bring oxygen to muscles that get starved of it during exercise. The hormone was one of the substances that Lance Armstrong, the seven-time Tour de France-winning cyclist, admitted to using during his career. Since it was established in , WADA has attempted to bring consistency to anti-doping procedures and testing across all sports and countries.
WADA has a list of 32 accredited laboratories that are allowed to analyze human test samples and that must submit their results to a central database. Russia's only accredited laboratory , the Moscow Antidoping Center, ceased activities this week after its officials were accused of destroying samples in the WADA report. In addition, top-level athletes are required to give WADA an hour window each day where their whereabouts are known, so that drugs testers can locate them if necessary.
What about athletes who use more than the recommended dose? What about other forms of doping hGh or EPO? Are those next to be permitted under proper medical supervision? The only way to preserve integrity in sport and protect the health of athletes is through a serious anti-doping approach. Although a long way from perfect, WADA has created the most comprehensive anti-doping program in the world indeed the only anti-doping program most of the world outside of the US models and implements.
American professional sports leagues should be looking at ways to model the WADA code in its own anti-doping policies like the United States Anti-Doping Agency is doing , not seeking ways to excuse steroid use or compromise anti-doping efforts. Steroids have no place in sports.
What about medical technology that repairs worn-out human parts? How many athletes have had joint repairs? Adding another risk on top of that is simply another dangerous choice made. Many people have been the beneficiaries of using illegal steroids.
In baseball, it has made many owners and players very rich. The idea that no one knew players were using steroids and PEDs is preposterous. They all knew and chose to get rich rather than protect the integrity of the sport. Likewise, in cycling doping made many riders rich. We live in an odd country. Some people who use illegal drugs spend their lives in prison; others become rich.
If there is significant money to be made, illegal steroid use is simply granted a free pass by all those involved. The fraud that baseball became, based on the illegal usage of steroids, HGH and other drugs, is a classic case.
Given the choice between getting rich and exposing the fraud, baseball teams — owners and players alike — chose to get rich. They took the money and left the public holding the bag. Steroids are a problem in sports to be sure, but the temptation is just too great to ever fully eradicate the matter.
This question epitomizes the steroid problem in sports. Whether or not such substances are banned, there will always be the impulse by someone to try it anyway — to improve their situation and to garner ever greater fame, success, and wealth.
He gave everyone a free pass. They all basically claimed the law, the CBA, or some other reason kept them from doing something about it. No, all Bud Selig had to do was speak out. Finally it was the players but everyone claimed there was no proof even though formerly skinny players began to look like Hulk Hogan.
Players cheating and breaking the law by even having steroids without prescriptions is one thing. The fraud that was perpetrated on the fans to induce them to buy tickets is another. In the end, it was Congress that exposed the fraud and demanded action, not MLB. I agree with the article, steroids truly have no place in sports. Steroids should not be used even for medical reasons because they have such a negative effect on the human body.
Even looking from a non-heath point of view, when players use steroids they are giving themselves an unfair advantage. The stronger and faster players are also the ones going to be the one breaking the records.
Which is unfair for earlier athletes, who might still hold some records in their desired sport, because they worked hard and did not use steroids. What Brent Musburger said to the Montana students is really quite disturbing. The burden of proof is placed on the league during an appeals process.
In the NBA, meanwhile, the approach is much more recovery-focused. Players who come forward with their drug problems receive league-funded counseling from the Life Extension Institute , a hour counseling center funded jointly by the NBA and the NBPA.
Any player testing positive for a drug of abuse or found to possess such a drug must submit to an initial evaluation by medical personnel, who then determine whether or not a treatment program is necessary.
The treatment program is agreed upon by medical personnel and the player, who can complete treatment as either an inpatient or an outpatient. Players who refuse to comply with the treatment program or who test positive for drugs of abuse after their evaluation and commitment to the treatment board may find themselves suspended or subject to other discipline.
Out of the major professional sports, the MLB has perhaps the most interesting history of drug policies. In January of , under pressure from Congress, the MLB and its players announced a new drug agreement, in which first offenses earned a day suspension and fourth violations earned a one-year ban. However, later that year, players and owners revised that agreement to say that first violations resulted in a game suspension, second violations resulted in game bans, and third violations earned lifetime bans.
In , players and owners agreed to have blood testing for HGH during spring training in , and blood testing has since been implemented during the regular season. In March of , players and owners announced that PED penalties would increase to 80 games for a first violation and games or a full season, including the postseason for a second violation; all suspensions are without pay.
In , the NFL announced stricter anti-doping policies, increasing the number of players tested and the number of random off-season tests; four years later, the NFL became the first major American sports league to approve blood testing for HGH, a policy which was finally implemented in What causes an athlete to assume the risk of taking drugs?
Many sports fans tend to take the black-and-white view of athletes and PEDs: professional athletes who take PEDs are labeled as poor decision makers, while athletes who reject PEDs are supporting the purity of the sport. However, athletes and PEDs actually lie more in a grey area. Instead, maybe we should begin asking ourselves — why so few?
0コメント